Junior Historians
  • Home
  • Digital History
    • Cold War Presidencies >
      • 1952 Election >
        • DDE Document 1
        • DDE Document 2
      • 1956 Election >
        • DDE Document 3
        • DDE Document 4
      • 1960 Election >
        • JFK Document 1
        • JFK Document 2
      • 1964 Election >
        • LBJ Document 1
        • LBJ Document 2
      • 1968 Election >
        • RMN Document 1
        • RMN Document 2
      • 1972 Election >
        • RMN Document 3
        • RMN Document 4
      • 1976 Election >
        • JC Document 1
        • JC Document 2
      • 1980 Election >
        • RWR Document 1
        • RWR Document 2
      • 1984 Election >
        • RWR Document 3
        • RWR Document 4
      • 1988 Election >
        • GHWB Document 1
        • GHWB Document 2
      • Teacher Resources
    • Cuban Missile Crisis Role Play >
      • CMC Activity Lesson Plan
      • Cuban Missile Crisis Activity Sources
      • Cuban Missile Crisis Activity Student Handouts
    • 9/11 Museum Curation >
      • The Lesson Plan
      • The Student Handout
      • The Article
      • The Artifacts
  • Media & Publications
  • About
  • Stay Connected

June 1982 Address

4/15/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
Introduction
President Reagan used tough talk and a firm stance to re-up the intensity in relations with Communists to win over voters in 1980. The disastrous string of foreign policy incidents under President Carter, especially the failure to negotiate the release of American hostages in Iran, made him look weak in tone and message compared to Reagan. In the summer following his inauguration, President Reagan took a trip to Europe to engage leaders there to take a more hardline stance against the USSR and join the United States in economic sanctions. In the following excerpt from his June 8th, 1982 address before the British Parliament, President Reagan explains his deep-rooted conviction to stamp out Communism in the world.

"...We're approaching the end of a bloody century plagued by a terrible political invention -- totalitarianism. Optimism comes less easily today, not because democracy is less vigorous, but because democracy's enemies have refined their instruments of repression. Yet optimism is in order, because day by day democracy is proving itself to be a not-at-all-fragile flower. From Stettin on the Baltic to Varna on the Black Sea, the regimes planted by totalitarianism have had more than 30 years to establish their legitimacy. But none -- not one regime -- has yet been able to risk free elections. Regimes planted by bayonets do not take root....

We have not inherited an easy world. If developments like the Industrial Revolution, which began here in England, and the gifts of science and technology have made life much easier for us, they have also made it more dangerous. There are threats now to our freedom, indeed to our very existence, that other generations could never even have imagined....

It may not be easy to see; but I believe we live now at a turning point.

In an ironic sense Karl Marx was right. We are witnessing today a great revolutionary crisis, a crisis where the demands of the economic order are conflicting directly with those of the political order. But the crisis is happening not in the free, non-Marxist West, but in the home of Marxist-Leninism, the Soviet Union. It is the Soviet Union that runs against the tide of history by denying human freedom and human dignity to its citizens. It also is in deep economic difficulty. The rate of growth in the national product has been steadily declining since the fifties and is less than half of what it was then....

Now, I don't wish to sound overly optimistic, yet the Soviet Union is not immune from the reality of what is going on in the world. It has happened in the past -- a small ruling elite either mistakenly attempts to ease domestic unrest through greater repression and foreign adventure, or it chooses a wiser course. It begins to allow its people a voice in their own destiny. Even if this latter process is not realized soon, I believe the renewed strength of the democratic movement, complemented by a global campaign for freedom, will strengthen the prospects for arms control and a world at peace.

I have discussed on other occasions, including my address on May 9th, the elements of Western policies toward the Soviet Union to safeguard our interests and protect the peace. What I am describing now is a plan and a hope for the long term -- the march of freedom and democracy which will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history as it has left other tyrannies which stifle the freedom and muzzle the self-expression of the people. And that's why we must continue our efforts to strengthen NATO even as we move forward with our Zero-Option initiative in the negotiations on intermediate-range forces and our proposal for a one-third reduction in strategic ballistic missile warheads.

Our military strength is a prerequisite to peace, but let it be clear we maintain this strength in the hope it will never be used, for the ultimate determinant in the struggle that's now going on in the world will not be bombs and rockets, but a test of wills and ideas, a trial of spiritual resolve, the values we hold, the beliefs we cherish, the ideals to which we are dedicated...."

Questions
  1. What reasons does President Reagan give for having diminished optimism about our country at the end of the 20th century?
  2. What reasons does President Reagan give for having diminished optimism about our world at the end of the 20th century?
  3. What reasons does President Reagan give for being more optimistic about our future?
  4. How does President Reagan illustrate that the Soviet Union is failing and that they are on the wrong side of history?

Reference Sources
Engel, Jeffrey A., Mark Atwood. Lawrence, and Andrew Preston, eds.America in the World: A History in Documents from the War with Spain to the War on Terror. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2014. Print.

Ronald Reagan, "Address to the Members of the British Parliament," June 8, 1982, Public Papers of the Presidency )Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1983), 742-48.
0 Comments

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.