Junior Historians
  • Home
  • Digital History
    • Cold War Presidencies >
      • 1952 Election >
        • DDE Document 1
        • DDE Document 2
      • 1956 Election >
        • DDE Document 3
        • DDE Document 4
      • 1960 Election >
        • JFK Document 1
        • JFK Document 2
      • 1964 Election >
        • LBJ Document 1
        • LBJ Document 2
      • 1968 Election >
        • RMN Document 1
        • RMN Document 2
      • 1972 Election >
        • RMN Document 3
        • RMN Document 4
      • 1976 Election >
        • JC Document 1
        • JC Document 2
      • 1980 Election >
        • RWR Document 1
        • RWR Document 2
      • 1984 Election >
        • RWR Document 3
        • RWR Document 4
      • 1988 Election >
        • GHWB Document 1
        • GHWB Document 2
      • Teacher Resources
    • Cuban Missile Crisis Role Play >
      • CMC Activity Lesson Plan
      • Cuban Missile Crisis Activity Sources
      • Cuban Missile Crisis Activity Student Handouts
    • 9/11 Museum Curation >
      • The Lesson Plan
      • The Student Handout
      • The Article
      • The Artifacts
  • Media & Publications
  • About
  • Stay Connected

New Digital History Project: Curating the 9/11 Museum

5/21/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
In teaching the events of 9/11 there is a tremendous opportunity to discuss the resiliency and resolve of our great nation. The terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 were the deadliest attacks on American soil in our nation's history. But the story doesn't end with the expansive and smoldering Ground Zero site in the heart of lower Manhattan. The stories of rescue, healing, and memorialization make the story of 9/11 one of resiliency.

I wanted to share this process with my students, who were all but a few months old when the attacks happened, in a way that would resonate with them. I found this opportunity in the incredible and very difficult work done by the 9/11 Memorial Museum's curator, Alice Greenwald. A veteran of Holocaust museums in various cities (including in Washington D.C.), Greenwald had the unenviable task of sifting through the thousands of artifacts and curating a museum that would speak to varied audiences and truthfully and honestly tell the story of 9/11.

This Digital History project asks students to play the role of curator in evaluating twelve 9/11 artifacts for possible inclusion in the 9/11 Memorial and Museum's collection. It begins with the students learning about the memorial contest and evaluating how the winning submission from Michael Arad met the stated contest criteria. This helps the students clearly identify the required criteria and to assess the success of the submission, setting them up to make their own proposals for artifact selection in using understood considerations and criteria. 

Next, the students do a close read of an abridged 2012
New York Times article in which the author clearly points to nearly a dozen considerations that museum staff had to weigh in selecting and creating exhibits. These included: telling the true story of 9/11, being careful not to re-traumatize visitors who experienced the attacks, speaking to a wide audience (in terms of age, association, and language), as well as protecting the privacy of the victims. In recording these considerations, the students will develop a checklist with which to evaluate the set of twelve artifacts.

Lastly, the students complete analysis worksheets for twelve real artifacts (some in the museum collection, others not) to evaluate the historical and emotional value and appropriateness of each item. The students then propose three artifacts that they would include in the collection and three that they would not include. I then projected these images on the class Smartboard and asked students to "vote with their feet": those supporting inclusion of the artifact move to stand by the image and those opposed move to the back of the room. We then engaged in a discussion and debate over the validity and value of including or omitting each artifact.

The lesson was a profound success and I encourage you to use it in your class and share your feedback with me. For those schools in the city, a trip to the 9/11 Memorial plaza is a highly recommended culminating activity, where students can see the memorial space first hand and evaluate its success for themselves. 

Be sure to see my blog post on teaching
Usama bin Laden's 1998 fatwa and an upcoming post on using RadioLab's "60 Words" podcast to teach the background and impact of the 2001 Authorization to Use Force.

Teaching 9/11 can be emotionally difficult - certainly more so for us teachers than for our young students - but the lessons of resiliency, healing, and the rebirth of the World Trade Center site provide for a unique opportunity to share a concrete and specific life lesson in the grief process and the indomitable human spirit.

The
lesson plan, student handout, NYT article, and artifacts can be found at the given links or under the Digital History tab at the top of the page.

Best,
Sean
sean@JuniorHistorians.com

0 Comments

Unpacking bin Laden's 1998 Fatwa

5/8/2015

1 Comment

 
Picture
Sometimes teaching history can be really difficult. Sometimes your own personal memories and experiences make it hard to present history in an unbiased, dispassionate, and constructive way. That was the struggle I faced this week as my eighth grade Junior Historians began discussing the attacks of September 11th, 2001.

It's a complicated story and history to clearly articulate. And furthermore, it's an even trickier story to tell without becoming entangled in regional, religious, and political biases. My personal memory cannot and does not have a role in how my students investigate this, or any event.
As part of the curriculum that I have developed under the banner of Junior Historians, for Harlem Academy, we investigate modern history. The kind of recent, modern history that I have lived through and experienced vividly as an adult, but that my students were not even alive to remember or understand. It's at this point in every school year that we arrive at the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the tragedy could be as ancient and distant as the Boston Massacre for all my students understand.

But it is so vital for my Junior Historians to understand the complexities of global terrorism in a world that is so shaped by its existence and threats to democratic society. My middle and high school education barely touched upon the Vietnam War, and was heavily loaded on WWII story lines. Growing up in a Cold War world, the historical context of the second great war was prescient and important. But as time marches on, the world post-WWII is less and less relevant to the kids born after September 11th, 2001. They were born into the post-Cold War, "New World Order" where technology has made the world more flat, more connected, and by proxy, a more expansive and diverse network that can be reached by extremist groups' propaganda.

Read More
1 Comment

Remembering the Kent State Shootings

5/4/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
© 1970 Valley News-Dispatch, John Paul Filo.
It was forty years ago today that this shocking image first entered into the consciousness of America. In response to President Nixon's widening of the Vietnam War by bombing Cambodia, students across the nation organized protests, as they had done many times in the years before. This time, however, the peaceful protest escalated to rock tossing and ended in a hail of bullets. The Ohio National Guard was called upon to quell the unruly protesters on campus but ended up opening fire and killing four students and wounding many others.
The turbulent sixties were borne of protesting and clashes between Hawks and Doves, but with President Nixon in the White House, things felt different. Nixon's avowed impatience and anger towards "anti-American" Vietnam War protesters reinforced (to this author) the burgeoning generational divide growing in our nation. The coming-of-age "Baby Boomers" were clashing with the power structure that was still firmly in the hands of their parents, the "Greatest Generation." The struggle between the young and the old, and those in power and those who seek to gain influence, is in some ways the very story of our nation. 

I wonder how the incident at Kent State forty years ago today can help us understand the increasing unrest we see in our cities today (most recently in Baltimore). Will a generational divide always be at the heart of our nation's political story? Will those who seek power have to bargain, cajole, and/or resort to force to wrest it from those who control our politics today? As George Orwell once wrote: "Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present now, controls the past."

Below are two primary source letters sent to Kent State in reaction to the shooting. The generational divide is front and center in the messages conveyed by each respective author. 

How would you use these sources in your classroom?

How can these documents (and the Kent St. shooting) help spark dialogue about current events?

Why isn't Jackson State cited or referred to as often as the events at Kent State?

Read More
0 Comments

    Picture

    Archives

    September 2016
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    July 2014



    Categories

    All
    Abolitionism
    American Revolution
    Assessments
    Civil Rights
    Curriculum
    Education Philosophy
    Gilder Lehrman Institute
    Gilder-Lehrman Institute
    Immigration
    Primary Source
    Student Work
    Urban Exploration


    Instagram

    RSS Feed

    Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.